The Effects of Stress of Job Functioning of Military Men and Women

Authors
Bray, R. M. Camlin, C. S. Fairbank, J. A. Dunteman, G. H. Wheeless, S. C.
Publication year
2001
Citation Title
The effects of stress of job functioning of military men and women.
Journal Name
Armed Forces & Society
Journal Volume
27
Issue Number
3
Page Numbers
397-417
DOI
10.1177/0095327X0102700304
Summary
Male and female Service members may be impacted by stressors differently, particularly given the predominately male composition of the military. Associations between self-reported job functioning, stressors, coping, and depression and substance use symptoms were examined among a large sample of Active Duty Service members. Stressors seem to impact male and female Service members’ job functioning differently, particularly depending upon type of stressor (e.g., work, family, health).
Key Findings
Service members were more likely to report the highest levels of stress related to work (39%) than related to family (22%), with more women having high family stress (29%) than men (22%).
Service members who reported the highest levels of work-related stress were at increased risk for lowered work functioning; risk was 28% higher for women and 15% higher for men.
Service members who reported the highest levels of health-related stress and depression symptoms were all at approximately a 30% increased risk of decreased job functioning.
Men, but not women, who reported the highest levels of family stress, negative coping, heavy drinking, and illicit drug use were at increased risk for lowered job functioning.
Implications for Program Leaders
Offer workshops to teach Service members techniques to balance work, family life, and other responsibilities and activities
Provide classes to help Service members prepare for and prevent stressors, particularly by planning ahead for deployment (e.g., preparing childcare, finances, legal documents)
Disseminate information to military families in existing military programs about effective coping strategies and stress management
Implications for Policy Makers
Recommend professional development courses for military leaders to educate them about stressors Service members and their families face and how gender may impact those stressors
Encourage adequate time off and scheduling flexibility when possible for Service members to address family concerns when they arise
Promote the use of community mental health services among Service members and their families, especially when stressors are impacting job functioning
Methods
Data from the 1995 Department of Defense (DoD) Survey of Health Related Behaviors Among Military Personnel, based on a random sample of all Active Duty military members, was used.
The sample was stratified by military branch, pay grade, and gender; there was a 70% response rate, with females, officers, and Air Force members being most likely to respond to the survey.
Relationships between self-reported job functioning, stressors (e.g., work, family, financial, health), coping, and depression and substance use symptoms were examined.
Participants
Participants included 16,193 Active Duty Service members, who were primarily male (82%), married (66%), enlisted (77%), and less than 35 years of age (60%).
Service members identified as White (69%), Black (16%), Latino (8%), or another race (7%).
Participants represented the Army (22%), Navy (26%), Marines (24%), and Air Force (27%).
Limitations
Certain populations (e.g., women, officers, Air Force members) were more likely to complete the study surveys, which may have biased results.
The coping style measurement was overly simplistic and categorized avoidance coping as negative and problem-focused coping as positive, potentially reducing validity of the measure.
Due to the cross-sectional nature of the data, no causal conclusions can be drawn about the relationships between gender, stressors, and job functioning.
Avenues for Future Research
Examine explanations for gender differences in the impact of stress on job functioning, including differences in responsibilities and roles, appraisal, reporting, and exposure to stressors
Compare whether military policies or practices differ in flexibility and time off to attend to family concerns between male and female Service members
Explore how use of a range of different coping styles may impact the relationship between stress and job functioning among Service members
Design Rating
2 Stars - There are some flaws in the study design or research sample, but those flaws do not significantly threaten the ability to make conclusions based on the data.
Methods Rating
1 Star - There are biases or significant deficits in the way the variables in the study are defined and measured or the analyses indirectly lead to the conclusions of the study.
Limitations Rating
1 Star - There are several factors that limit the ability to extend the results to a population and therefore the results can only be extended to a very specific subset of the population.
Focus
Multiple Branches
Target Population
Population Focus
Military Branch
Military Component
Abstract
This study examined the relationships between domains of stress (work-related, familyrelated, finances-related, health-related), coping style, substance use, and symptoms of depression with level of job functioning among women and men in the U.S. armed forces. Multivariate cumulative logistic regression analyses were conducted with data from the 1995 Department of Defense Survey of Health Related Behaviors among Military Personnel. Results showed that both military men and women were nearly twice as likely to report higher levels of stress at work (39%) than in their family or personal lives (22%). In contrast, women (29%) were more likely than men (22%) to experience high levels of family stress. Additionally, 33% of women experienced high stress due to being a woman in the military. The effects of stress and depression on job functioning were quite similar for women and men. For both genders, higher levels of work-related stress, health-related stress, and number of depressive symptoms increased the odds of a lower level of job functioning. In addition, for men only, higher levels of family-related stress, use of a negative coping style, illicit drug use, and being a heavy drinker increased the likelihood of lower job functioning. Findings suggest that it may be useful for military health providers to focus on interventions to identify, prevent, and provide care for stress-related problems and depressive symptoms for military personnel.
Attach