Understanding Deinstitutionalization: What Families Value and Desire in the Transition to Community Living

Authors
Jones, J. L. Gallus, K. L.
Publication year
2016
Citation Title
Understanding deinstitutionalization: What families value and desire in the transition to community living.
Journal Name
Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities
Journal Volume
41
Issue Number
2
Page Numbers
116-131
DOI
10.1177/1540796916637050
Summary
Professionals and families experiencing the transition from institutionalization to community-living often face additional stress and challenges. This study explored family members of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) experiences regarding this mandated transition. Findings revealed six common themes reflecting a desire to connect and engage with communities and professionals of IDD services and support, but that they experienced barriers to doing so.
Key Findings
Family members’ were respectful of their relatives with IDD as their experiences living in residential support institutions were places that they felt at home and had built meaningful relationships.
There was a strong desire to collaborate among family members and agencies such as Developmental Disabilities Services, especially during the move and transition into the community.
Acquiring, training, and retaining qualified staff who served their relatives in community-living were indicated as significant sources of stress for all family members.
Implications for Military Professionals
Partner with military families to help emphasize the importance of collaboration with the community throughout the deinstitutionalization process
Provide ongoing support to military families as they adapt to community-living and new agency providers
Implications for Program Leaders
Develop workshops for Service members and their families with IDD to provide them with effective strategies to communicate their concerns with community-living care
Create curricula for the purpose of building systems of support and collaboration among individuals with IDD, their families, and community-living service providers
Implications for Policy Makers
Continue to provide resources to support individuals with IDD and their families, especially during times of deinstitutionalization transition
Encourage professionals who work with individuals with IDD and their families to promote collaboration among services to create a smoother transition and sense of community belonging
Methods
Participants were recruited through mailed invitation using contact information provided by Oklahoma Developmental Disabilities Services of clients with IDD who transitioned out of institutions.
Semi-structured interviews (45 to 120 minutes in length) were conducted with family members of individuals with IDD, including questions about family history, relationships, roles, communication, and decision-making regarding institutionalization and deinstitutionalization.
Interview content was coded and six common themes were identified in family members’ responses.
Participants
The sample included 23 family members, 10 were mothers, six sisters, three fathers, three brothers, and one was a brother-in-law all of which were relatives of 12 males and seven females with IDD.
Ages ranged from 51 to 85 years (M = 65.33, SD = 9.01) for family members and 35 to 70 years (M = 52.31, SD = 10.03) for individuals with IDD.
A majority of the family members were White (n = 18), followed by two Black, and one Latino. No data were provided on the race or ethnicity of two family members or individuals with IDD.
Limitations
All of the sample were relatives of individuals with IDD who had experienced mandated deinstitutionalization, so results may not extend to those who had not experienced this transition.
Participants were recruited from Oklahoma Developmental Disabilities Services, thus limiting the ability to generalize the results to families of relatives with IDD residing in other states.
The study was cross-sectional therefore no claims can be made based on what factors caused outcomes of community-living among family members of relatives with IDD.
Avenues for Future Research
Investigate whether there are differences or similarities in opinions and experiences regarding care and level of support among community-living staff and relatives of individuals’ with IDD
Explore the long-term experiences of community-living for family members of relatives with IDD, including family roles, relationships, and responsibilities
Examine the deinstitutionalization experiences of family members and staff of individuals with IDD in other states or communities, such as schools
Design Rating
2 Stars - There are some flaws in the study design or research sample, but those flaws do not significantly threaten the ability to make conclusions based on the data.
Methods Rating
2 Stars - There are no significant biases or deficits in the way the variables in the study are defined or measures and conclusions are appropriately drawn from the analyses performed.
Limitations Rating
2 Stars - There are a few factors that limit the ability to extend the results to an entire population, but the results can be extended to most of the population.
Focus
Civilian
Target Population
Population Focus
Abstract
The deinstitutionalization movement that began 50 years ago remains a current issue for professionals and families. Using qualitative phenomenology methodology, we investigated the experience of mandated deinstitutionalization for parents and siblings whose relatives with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) transitioned from institutionalization to community living within the past 1 to 3 years. Findings from the current study align with previous research wherein, over time, most families shift from opposition to satisfaction regarding community living; however, family members’ narratives in the current study reveal there is more to the process of deinstitutionalization than the outcome of satisfaction. Family members, regardless of current opposition or satisfaction, shared six common themes concerning what they desired and valued throughout the deinstitutionalization process: (a) respect our relative’s history, (b) collaborate: make us feel like we are a part of the process, (c) provide quality care, (d) provide consistent care, (e) include my relative in the community, and (f) remember we are family. As the desirable goals of full community inclusion (e.g., education, community living, competitive employment) are implemented through policy and practice, professionals must continue to develop intentional collaborations with, and supports for, families during times of transition in conjunction with services and supports developed for individuals with IDD.
Attach