Generalized Anxiety and Relational Uncertainty as Predictors of Topic Avoidance During Reintegration Following Military Deployment

Authors
Knobloch, L. K. Ebata, A. T. McGlaughlin, P. C. Theiss, J. A.
Publication year
2013
Citation Title
Generalized anxiety and relational uncertainty as predictors of topic avoidance during reintegration following military deployment.
Journal Name
Communication Monographs
Journal Volume
80
Issue Number
4
Page Numbers
452-477
DOI
10.1080/03637751.2013.828159
Summary
Service members and their romantic partners often encounter communication problems after deployment. In one study, 220 returning Service members talked about their topic avoidance (i.e., topics that they avoided talking about) with their partner after deployment. In a second study, 118 military couples answered questions regarding their symptoms of generalized anxiety, relational uncertainty (i.e., having questions about the status of a relationship), and topic avoidance. Results revealed eight avoided topics and indicated an association between anxiety, relational uncertainty, and topic avoidance.
Key Findings
About half (51%) of Service members in study one reported being reluctant to discuss certain topics with their partner after reunion; commonly avoided topics were dangers and experiences during deployment, household stressors, etc.
Couples in study two reported topic avoidance in the first 30 days after returning from deployment.
Generalized anxiety and relational uncertainty of Service members, but not their partners, were associated with topic avoidance.
Implications for Program Leaders
Disseminate information regarding common topics that military couples avoid during the reintegration stage, and ways to talk about these topics safely
Encourage military couples to participate in workshops that focus on developing communication skills and healthy relationships
Offer workshops to Service members to decrease their relational uncertainty
Implications for Policy Makers
Continue to support reintegration programs that assist military families to readjust to Service members' return
Promote the development of marriage education programs that focus on improving military couples' communication skills
Recommend the use of marriage and relationship handbooks as an integral part of family readiness programs
Methods
Participants were recruited by advertising at reintegration workshops and online forums. Service members who were in a romantic relationship and returned from a deployment in the last six months were qualified for study one. In study two, one or both partners had to recently return from deployment to be eligible to participate.
In study one, Service members answered an open-ended question "Now that you are reunited, what topics ... do you avoid talking about with your partner?". In study two, participants' generalized anxiety, relational uncertainty, and topic avoidance were assessed three times (30 days apart).
Data were analyzed to extract common avoided topics in study one and the associations between generalized anxiety, relational uncertainty, and topic avoidance in study two.
Participants
In study one, participants were 220 Service members (185 males) with an average age of 32.69 years (age range = 18-57 years, SD = 8.45); most of them were White (80%), followed by Black (6%), Latino (5%), and other (9%).
In study two, participants were 118 heterosexual military couples with an average age of 33.03 years (age range = 21-63 years, SD = 6.84); most of them were White (84%), followed by Black (4%), Latino (6%), and other (6%).
The military branches that study one participants served in were: National Guard (64%), Army (28%), Navy (3%), Air Force (3%), and Marines (2%). The military branches that Service members in study two served in were: Army (57%), Army National Guard (21%), Air National Guard (13%), Air Force (6%), and Marines (3%).
Limitations
Most participants were affiliated with the Army and the National Guard, so caution must be taken to generalize the results to other military branches.
Topic avoidance was measured by an open-ended question in study one but several closed-ended questions in study; therefore, it was hard to directly compare topic avoidance in the two studies.
Only heterosexual couples were included in study two, so findings cannot be generalized to same-sex couples.
Avenues for Future Research
Recruit participants from all military branches so that the findings can be better generalized
Explore other factors (e.g., depression) that may cause topic avoidance in the reintegration period
Conduct longitudinal studies to examine the causal relationship between generalized anxiety, relational uncertainty, and topic avoidance
Design Rating
3 Stars - There are few flaws in the study design or research sample. The flaws that are present are minor and have no effect on the ability to draw conclusions from the data.
Methods Rating
2 Stars - There are no significant biases or deficits in the way the variables in the study are defined or measures and conclusions are appropriately drawn from the analyses performed.
Limitations Rating
3 Stars - There are only minor factors that limit the ability to extend the results to an entire population.
Focus
Multiple Branches
Target Population
Population Focus
Military Branch
Military Component
Abstract
For military couples reunited following deployment, discussing or avoiding topics is a central dimension of communication. This paper theorizes about two predictors of topic avoidance that arise from a lack of confidence in social situations: generalized anxiety and relational uncertainty. In Study 1, 220 returning service members described issues they avoid discussing upon reunion. Content analytic findings indicated eight avoided topics. In Study 2, 118 military couples reported on topic avoidance for the first 3 months after homecoming. Multilevel modeling results revealed that the generalized anxiety and relational uncertainty of actors, but not partners, were consistent predictors of topic avoidance. The findings illuminate the complexities of communicating following a tour of duty.
Attach