Emotion Expression, Avoidance and Psychological Health During Reintegration: A Dyadic Analysis of Actor and Partner Associations Within a Sample of Military Couples

Authors
Marini, C. M. Wadsworth, S. M. Christ, S. L. Franks, M. M.
Publication year
2015
Citation Title
Emotion expression, avoidance and psychological health during reintegration: A dyadic analysis of actor and partner associations within a sample of military couples.
Journal Name
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
Journal Volume
34
Issue Number
1
Page Numbers
69-90
DOI
10.1177/0265407515621180
Summary
Whether certain coping strategies are adaptive may depend upon the context and the relationships in which they are used. The effects of Service members' and their partners' use of emotional expression and avoidance on each other's psychological well-being were examined. Generally, individuals' psychological health was better when using emotional expression and poorer when using avoidance, but partners' emotional expression was related to poorer Service members' well-being.
Key Findings
Soldiers and partners who used greater emotional expression and less avoidance had better individual psychological health.
Overall, Soldiers' and partners' coping strategies did not impact one another's psychological health and coping strategies did not interact to impact either's well-being.
Among Soldiers with high levels of combat exposure only, greater emotional expression used by partners was associated with poorer Soldier psychological health.
Implications for Program Leaders
Educate military couples about how coping strategies can affect relationships and about the most adaptive coping strategies post-deployment
Offer workshops to support Service members post-deployment in adapting their coping strategies from what was useful during deployment to what is useful post-deployment
Provide military couples with information about communicating and reconnecting post-deployment, as well as relationship resources (e.g., handouts with mental health referrals and useful books or websites with evidence-based relationship information) for distressed couples
Implications for Policy Makers
Recommend education for professionals working with military couples about effective post-deployment coping and how it impacts intimate relationships
Continue to support programs that help Service members adjust to post-deployment, particularly programs for individuals with high combat-exposure
Recommend collaboration with community mental health services for couples to promote the utilization of relationship interventions post-deployment
Methods
A team of 3,400 Army National Guard Soldiers who had been deployed within the past 18 months and had a spouse or cohabitating partner were recruited via mail and Family Readiness Groups.
Soldiers and partners completed surveys about personal and military demographic information, resilience, social support, well-being, coping, intimate relationships, and family functioning.
The effects of Service members' and partners' use of coping strategies and Service members' combat exposure on their own and each other's psychological well-being was examined.
Participants
Participants included 175 male National Guard Soldiers and their female partners (n = 350).
Partners were primarily White (95%) and had an average age of 32.3 years (SD = 8.43).
Service members were primarily White (94%); on average, they were 33.4 years (SD = 8.26) of age, had been in a relationship for 9.70 years (SD = 7.48), and had 1.95 kids (SD = 1.49).
Service members were mostly enlisted (82%), had spent an average of 11.4 years (SD = 6.79) in the military, and had an average of 1.84 deployments (SD = 0.87) in the past five years.
Limitations
The dependent variable was measured using a single question about psychological health and well-being, potentially decreasing validity and limiting conclusions.
Data from only male Soldiers and female partners was used, making it difficult to generalize to couples with female Service members or to other branches of the military.
Measures asked about stressors generally, rather than stressors related to reintegration post-deployment, so coping reported was not necessarily coping to military-related stressors.
Avenues for Future Research
Compare coping strategies in couples of Service members who were or were not deployed to understand how deployment may impact the use and adaptiveness of coping strategies
Examine whether different types of partner emotional expression (e.g., empathy versus criticism for negative emotions) may have different effects on combat-exposed Service members
Investigate whether spouses of Service members with high combat exposure express more negative emotions compared to spouses of Service members with low or no combat exposure
Design Rating
2 Stars - There are some flaws in the study design or research sample, but those flaws do not significantly threaten the ability to make conclusions based on the data.
Methods Rating
2 Stars - There are no significant biases or deficits in the way the variables in the study are defined or measures and conclusions are appropriately drawn from the analyses performed.
Limitations Rating
2 Stars - There are a few factors that limit the ability to extend the results to an entire population, but the results can be extended to most of the population.
Focus
Army
Population Focus
Military Branch
Military Component
Abstract
We evaluated the extent to which military service membersÕ and their significant othersÕ coping strategies (i.e., individual use of emotion expression and avoidance) were independently associated with their ownÑand each otherÕsÑpsychological health during reintegration using an actorÐpartner interdependence model. We simultaneously evaluated actor associations (e.g., associations between service membersÕ own coping and psychological health) and partner associations (e.g., associations between service membersÕ coping and their significant othersÕ psychological health) with a sample of 175 National Guard couples who recently experienced deployment. We further evaluated (1) whether there were interactive associations among partnersÕ coping strategies and (2) whether service membersÕ level of combat exposure moderated any of these associations. Results indicated that, for both service members and significant others, psychological health was positively associated with oneÕs own emotion expression and negatively associated with oneÕs own avoidance. Moreover, there was a significant partner association between service membersÕ psychological health and their significant othersÕ emotion expression but only in the context of high combat exposure. Implications for intervention and prevention efforts are discussed.
Attach