Military-Related Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Intimate Relationship Behaviors: A Developing Dyadic Relationship Model

Authors
Gerlock, A. A. Grimesey, J. Sayre, G.
Publication year
2014
Citation Title
Military-related posttraumatic stress disorder and intimate relationship behaviors: A developing dyadic relationship model.
Journal Name
Journal of Marital and Family Therapy
Journal Volume
40
Issue Number
3
Page Numbers
344-356
DOI
10.1111/jmft.12017
Summary
Twenty-three couples, in which one partner was a Veteran, were selected from a larger qualitative sample to better understand the impact of war zone deployment on intimate relationships. Results found that posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) caused by war-zone deployment experiences negatively impacted current or new relationships. Six relationship themes and three relationship qualities emerged from the qualitative interviews as areas where PTSD impacted couples greatly.
Key Findings
Results indicated that combat-related PTSD negatively impacted existing or new intimate relationships due to unique factors it brings into the relationship (i.e. chemical dependency, trauma symptoms).
Relationship themes (areas where PTSD impacted couple functioning) and relationship qualities (characteristics prominent in relationships with PTSD) were two categories that emerged from the data.
Six themes (communication, caregiving, community, disability, responsibility, and trauma) and three relationship qualities (i.e. mutuality, balanced locus of control, and weakness tolerance) were shown to impact each partner’s ability to resolve conflict and communicate effectively.
Implications for Program Leaders
Enhance education, activities, and curriculum related to positive coping behaviors for military couples dealing with PTSD symptoms
Offer workshops during reintegration to help families and Service members adjust to the Service member’s return, especially when deployment included combat exposure
Disseminate information regarding possible symptoms of mental health problems Service members may face after deployment and where individuals and families can find help for those problems
Implications for Policy Makers
Encourage the development and continuation of programs that can promote resilience in Service members, their partners, and children
Promote reintegration programs that include attention to assisting Service members’ families in adjusting to their return
Recommend partnerships among military-based and community-based programs to help military families gain peer and community support during and after deployment
Methods
Data were gathered from the Relationships and PTSD Study, a qualitative study examining the experiences of Intimate Partner Violence with a sample of 441 couples.
Twenty-three couples were selected based on criteria such as, clear audio recording, appropriate length response, and detailed responses.
Analyses used a modified grounded theory methodology, which examined the impact of Veteran’s PTSD on an intimate relationship including conflict resolution and dyadic functioning.
Participants
Twenty-three couples comprised of military Veterans and their female partners participated in the study.
Thirteen couples identified as having self-reported intimate partner violence (IPV), whereas 10 reported as not engaging in IPV.
The couples’ ages ranged from 27-83 years and were comprised of the following ethnic and racial backgrounds: Black (n=7), Asian-American (n=2), White (n=27), Latino (n=2), and Multiracial/Other (n=8).
Veterans represented the following military branches: Army (n=14), Marines (n=5), Navy (n=2), Air Force (n=1), and multiple branches (n=1).
Limitations
Selected participants (i.e., couples) may differ from non-participants in a way that is not measured but affected the results and generalizability of findings.
Study did not specifically explain inter-rater reliability and validity in using qualitative coding techniques among the research study team, which could influence results, such as categories and themes stemming from partner interviews.
Other untested variables may be confounding results, such as the impact of intimate partner violence.
Avenues for Future Research
Focus on couples with a partner with combat-related PTSD to differentiate between behaviors of intimate partner violence and PTSD symptoms
Examine characteristics or skills of couples who are able to effectively manage PTSD symptoms
Execute qualitative studies on couples with a partner with war-zone related PTSD from various sites and random sampling to provide generalizable results
Design Rating
2 Stars - There are some flaws in the study design or research sample, but those flaws do not significantly threaten the ability to make conclusions based on the data.
Methods Rating
2 Stars - There are no significant biases or deficits in the way the variables in the study are defined or measures and conclusions are appropriately drawn from the analyses performed.
Limitations Rating
1 Star - There are several factors that limit the ability to extend the results to a population and therefore the results can only be extended to a very specific subset of the population.
Focus
Multiple Branches
Target Population
Population Focus
Military Component
Abstract
The protracted conflict in Iraq and Afghanistan and an all-volunteer military has resulted in multiple war zone deployments for many service members. While quick redeployment turnaround has left little time for readjustment for either the service member or family, dealing with the long-term sequelae of combat exposure often leaves families and intimate partners ill-prepared for years after deployments. Using a modified grounded theory approach, digitally recorded couple interviews of 23 couples were purposefully selected from a larger sample of 441 couples to better understand the impact of war zone deployment on the couple. The veteran sample was recruited from a randomly selected cohort of men in treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Overall, it was found when veterans experiencing deployment-related PTSD reenter or start new intimate relationships they may bring with them a unique cluster of interrelated issues which include PTSD symptoms, physical impairment, high rates of alcohol and/or drug abuse, and psychological and physical aggression. These factors contributed to a dynamic of exacerbating conflict. How these couples approached relationship qualities of mutuality, balanced locus of control and weakness tolerance across six axes of caregiving, disability, responsibility, trauma, communication, and community impacted the couple’s capacity to communicate and resolve conflict. This dyadic relationship model is used to help inform implications for clinical practice.
Attach