Crossover of Organizational Commitment

Authors
Bull Schaefer, R. A. Green, S. G. Saxena, M. Weiss, H. M.
Publication year
2013
Citation Title
Crossover of organizational commitment.
Journal Name
Human Performance
Journal Volume
26
Issue Number
4
Page Numbers
261-274
DOI
10.1080/08959285.2013.814657
Summary
This study explored the relationship between spousal commitment, spousal emotions about reenlistment, Service members' reenlistment, and Service members' attitudes towards military service. Findings suggest spouses' emotions as it relates to reenlistment impact spouses' and Service members' level of commitment to military service.
Key Findings
Military spouses’ expression of positive emotions was positively related to Service members’ levels of commitment to reenlist.
Spouses’ attitudes about the military were associated with Service members’ reports of spouses’ emotions when discussing reenlistment, and these reports of emotions were predictors of Service members’ work attitudes.
Spouses’ positive emotions during discussions of reenlistment were positively related to both spouses’ and Service members’ level of commitment.
Implications for Program Leaders
Create peer support groups for military spouses to help them learn coping skills to better help them manage potential negative emotions and reactions related to reenlistment
Offer training workshops for professionals who work with military families about how to address families’ concerns about reenlistment
Develop after-school activities for military-connected youth so that they learn how to better cope with changes related to military experiences (e.g., reenlistment, deployment)
Implications for Policy Makers
Support programming that provides resources on well-being and coping for military families during the reenlistment process
Encourage collaboration with community-based organizations to provide additional support to military spouses who have difficulty coping with military service-related decisions
Develop initiatives that increase awareness about the link between emotional experiences and commitment to military service
Methods
Qualitative data were gathered from focus groups of military spouses over a year. Their responses were used to inform the questions on a measure of spousal commitment that was used in the next part of the study.
Quantitative data were collected by mailing surveys to military members and their spouses for each to complete and return via postal mail separately.
No information were provided as to the recruitment methods of the focus group members or the participants who completed the surveys.
Participants
Two groups of participants were included in this study. One group, 76 military spouses, participated in focus groups over a year. Data from the focus groups were used to create a spousal commitment measure.
The second group consisted of 186 Service members and their spouses who each completed a self-report survey. The survey consisted of questions about Service members’ and military spouses’ organizational commitment, reenlistment intention, and spouses’ displays of emotion.
No demographic data were provided about either of the two samples.
Limitations
There were many terms that were not well-defined in the description of the study, which limited the ability to understand and interpret all of the findings.
There was no explanation of the recruitment methods for the military spouses who participated in the focus groups and therefore it is impossible to compare spouses in the focus groups against those across military branches.
The data were cross-sectional, which means the direction of the relationship between reenlistment, commitment, and negative emotions is unclear.
Avenues for Future Research
Conduct a focus group of both Service members and their spouses to interview both about spousal commitment before and after reenlistment
Investigate any relationship between Service member reenlistment and parents’ of Service members reports of negative emotions
Gather data on military connected youth’s emotional experiences regarding their military parent(s) reenlistment
Design Rating
2 Stars - There are some flaws in the study design or research sample, but those flaws do not significantly threaten the ability to make conclusions based on the data.
Methods Rating
1 Star - There are biases or significant deficits in the way the variables in the study are defined and measured or the analyses indirectly lead to the conclusions of the study.
Limitations Rating
1 Star - There are several factors that limit the ability to extend the results to a population and therefore the results can only be extended to a very specific subset of the population.
Focus
Multiple Branches
Target Population
Population Focus
Military Branch
Military Component
Abstract
Spousal commitment toward an employee’s organization is a little-studied construct that deserves attention because his or her spouse may influence the employee’s assessments of organizational commitment and turnover intentions. Using 186 couples, this study investigated spousal influence on U.S. military members’ organizational commitment and their decisions to reenlist. Results of a structural equation model analysis indicate that indirect mechanisms of crossover (e.g., positive emotions displayed by the spouse during discussions of reenlistment) facilitated the positive relationships between the organizational commitment of military spouses and members. Findings and discussion contribute to the fields of organizational commitment and crossover, and we conclude our analysis by offering practical implications for nonmilitary occupations.
Attach