Suspected Child and Spouse Maltreatment Referral Sources: Who Reports Child and Spouse Maltreatment to the Air Force Family Advocacy Program?

Authors
Linkh, D. J. Besetsny, L. K. Collins, P. S. Thomsen, C. J. Rabenhorst, M. M. Rosenbaum, A. Milner, J. S.
Publication year
2008
Citation Title
Suspected child and spouse maltreatment referral sources: Who reports child and spouse maltreatment to the Air Force Family Advocacy Program?
Journal Name
Military Medicine
Journal Volume
173
Issue Number
12
Page Numbers
1203-1209
DOI
10.7205/MILMED.173.12.1203
Summary
Suspected child and spouse maltreatment reports were evaluated to determine referral source for Air Force families. Suspected Air Force child maltreatment reports were then compared to U.S. national child maltreatment data to explore how referral source differed among the samples. The majority of child and spouse maltreatment reports were referred by military sources and child maltreatment reports were similar between the Air Force and U.S. families.
Key Findings
Commands, military law enforcement, and medical/psychological personnel had the highest percentage of referrals for both spouse and child maltreatment.
Most Family Advocacy Program (FAP) referrals for both spouse and child maltreatment came from military or non-affiliated sources while civilian sources referred the least.
Child and spouse maltreatment type (i.e., physical, emotional, sexual, neglect, or multiple types) influenced referral source, particularly for child maltreatment.
Maltreatment referral sources in the Air Force and civilian population were similar, except offenders and victims in the Air Force population had more self-referrals.
Implications for Program Leaders
Continue to educate military personnel regarding how to recognize and report suspected child and spouse maltreatment
Disseminate information to civilian agencies that interact with military families regarding how to report child and spouse maltreatment to FAP
Provide education to military Service members and their families to enhance the use of healthy coping to prevent child and spouse maltreatment
Implications for Policy Makers
Continue to support programs designed to identify and prevent child and spouse maltreatment in military families
Continue to encourage collaboration between FAP and civilian child protective service agencies
Recommend education for service providers about the different types of abuse as this may influence referral source
Methods
Suspected child and spouse maltreatment reports that occurred between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2004 were obtained from the Air Force Family Advocacy System of Records Clinical Information System.
Child maltreatment data from the U.S. Health and Human Services national registry was used to compare U.S. national child maltreatment data with Air Force child maltreatment data.
Referral sources included military (e.g., law enforcement, Commands), nonmilitary (e.g., social services, clergy), and nonaffiliated (e.g., friends, alleged victim) sources.
Participants
A total of 42,389 Air Force maltreatment referrals occurred during the study period; 21,362 for suspected child maltreatment and 21,027 for suspected spouse maltreatment.
Suspected reports of child and spouse maltreatment only included those reported to the Air Force FAP.
No demographic data were provided.
Limitations
Results only included suspected child maltreatment reports made to the Air Force FAP and therefore do not account for reports made to civilian child protective agencies or unreported occurrences of family violence.
Differences between child age and referral source were not examined and could provide meaningful information regarding which referral sources are most common for children of varying ages.
This study only included Air Force suspected child and spouse maltreatment reports, limiting the generalizability to other service branches.
Avenues for Future Research
Investigate the potential barriers associated with reporting child and spouse maltreatment across civilian and military agencies
Explore how maltreatment type and child age influence the rate of reporting by referral source
Continue to examine differences in referral sources for child maltreatment among military and civilian populations to inform policy regarding mandated reporting for nonmilitary and military professionals
Design Rating
2 Stars - There are some flaws in the study design or research sample, but those flaws do not significantly threaten the ability to make conclusions based on the data.
Methods Rating
2 Stars - There are no significant biases or deficits in the way the variables in the study are defined or measures and conclusions are appropriately drawn from the analyses performed.
Limitations Rating
2 Stars - There are a few factors that limit the ability to extend the results to an entire population, but the results can be extended to most of the population.
Focus
Air Force
Population Focus
Military Branch
Military Component
Abstract
The present study describes the sources of Air Force (AF) Family Advocacy Program referrals (N = = 42,389) for child and spouse maltreatment between 2000 and 2004. Sources of referrals were stable over time, with military sources accounting for the majority of both child and spouse referrals. Most (85%) of spouse maltreatment referrals came from AF law enforcement, medical and psychological staff, command, and victim self-referrals. For child maltreatment, most referrals (71%) were from law enforcement, medical and psychological staff, command, social services, and friends or relatives. Differences in the sources of referrals across different types of maltreatment were greater for child than for spouse maltreatment. Comparison of the sources of child maltreatment referrals in the AF and U.S. samples revealed substantial similarity. However, self-referrals by the victim or offender were more common in the Air Force, whereas referrals by friends and relatives or by school or child care staff were more common in the U.S. sample.
Attach