Male Soldier Family Violence Offenders: Spouse and Child Offenders Compared to Child Offenders

Authors
Martin, S. L. Gibbs, D. A. Johnson, R. E. Rentz, E. D. Clinton-Sherrod, M. Hardison Walters, J. L. Sullivan, K.
Publication year
2009
Citation Title
Male soldier family violence offenders: Spouse and child offenders compared to child offenders
Journal Name
Violence and Victims
Journal Volume
24
Issue Number
4
Page Numbers
458-468
DOI
10.1891/0886-6708.24.4.458
Summary
Substantiated maltreatment reports of 2,969 married, male Soldiers were used to explore the differences between first-time offenders who engaged in both child and spouse maltreatment (dual offenders) versus those who only engaged in child maltreatment (single offender). Differences between type of abuse, severity (mild or moderate/severe), and demographic variables (e.g., race/ethnicity, paygrade, age, rank, substance use, and subsequent abuse incidences) were found.
Key Findings
Compared to single offenders, dual offenders were more likely to be under the influence of a substance at the time of their offense (9% versus 28%), with the majority of offenders using alcohol (94%).
For child maltreatment, dual offenders more often perpetrated neglect (49%) and emotional abuse (45%), whereas single offenders more often perpetrated physical (42%) and sexual abuse (11%).
Physical (81%) and emotional abuse (29%) were the most common forms of spouse maltreatment for dual offenders.
Dual offenders were more likely to engage in mild forms of child abuse, but more severe forms of spouse abuse compared to single offenders.
Implications for Program Leaders
Provide education to military couples to enhance positive communication and the use of healthy coping mechanisms for handling stress and conflict
Provide support to military families who have experienced abuse and identify appropriate programs and services that help victims of abuse
Disseminate information to family providers regarding the signs of abuse and how to appropriately report child and spouse abuse within military families
Implications for Policy Makers
Continue to support programs that focus on preventing and identifying maltreatment in military families
Encourage the development of programs that work with family violence offenders to reduce the rate of repeat offenders
Recommend education for service providers and military leaders regarding the risk factors and signs of child and spouse maltreatment
Methods
Substantiated records from the Army Central Registry for first-time spouse and child maltreatment offenders were utilized for the study.
Participant records were restricted to Active Duty, male Soldiers, who were married, and had an initial substantiated report occurring between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2004.
Dual offenders were those who, at the time of the initial substantiated report, had engaged in both child and spouse maltreatment. Single offenders engaged in child maltreatment only.
A variety of factors were explored as they related to dual and single offenders, such as abuse type, severity, and demographic characteristics.
Participants
Participants included 2,969 married, male Soldiers with substantiated maltreatment reports; 26% (n = 760) were dual offenders and 74% (n = 2,209) were single offenders.
Dual offenders were more likely to identify as Black or Latino/other, were younger (M = 28.6 vs 29.8), and were in lower pay grades (E1-E3) than single offenders.
Both single and dual offenders were more likely to be enlisted Service members (95%).
No full sample demographic information was provided.
Limitations
Only married, male Soldiers were included in the study, limiting the applicability of results to other types of offenders (e.g., female Soldiers or unmarried couples).
Participants were only Service members from the Army, limiting the generalizability of results to other branches of the military.
Data from January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2004 were utilized and may not reflect current rates of spouse and child maltreatment.
Avenues for Future Research
Examine the similarity and difference between single and dual offenders within other military branches
Examine rates of maltreatment among other family types (e.g. unmarried couples or same sex couples)
Explore possible interventions to reduce the risk of repeat offenders
Design Rating
2 Stars - There are some flaws in the study design or research sample, but those flaws do not significantly threaten the ability to make conclusions based on the data.
Methods Rating
2 Stars - There are no significant biases or deficits in the way the variables in the study are defined or measures and conclusions are appropriately drawn from the analyses performed.
Limitations Rating
2 Stars - There are a few factors that limit the ability to extend the results to an entire population, but the results can be extended to most of the population.
Focus
Army
Population Focus
Military Branch
Military Component
Abstract
Army data from 2000 to 2004 were used to compare two groups of married, male, Army soldier, first-time family violence offenders: 760 dual offenders (whose initial incident included both child maltreatment and spouse abuse) and 2,209 single offenders (whose initial incident included only child maltreatment). The majority (81%) of dual offenders perpetrated physical spouse abuse; however, dual offenders were less likely than single offenders to perpetrate physical child abuse (16% vs. 42%) or sexual child abuse (1% vs. 11%), but they were more likely to perpetrate emotional child abuse (45% vs. 12%). These findings may be, at least in part, explained in light of the Army Family Advocacy Program policy, which considers spouse offenders as also being emotional child abuse offenders since children may be traumatized by exposure to spouse abuse.
Attach