National Guard Service Members' Perceptions of Informal and Formal Supports: An Exploratory Study

Authors
Reedy, A. R. Kobayashi, R.
Publication year
2015
Citation Title
National Guard service members’ perceptions of informal and formal supports: An exploratory study
Journal Name
Journal of Social Work in Disability & Rehabilitation
Journal Volume
14
Issue Number
2
Page Numbers
110-123
DOI
10.1080/1536710X.2015.1014534
Summary
An exploration of informal and formal supports that National Guard Service members use was conducted. Using an ecological systems perspective, this exploratory pilot study assessed awareness, access, use, satisfaction, and perceptions of the effectiveness of informal and formal supports in a small group of National Guard Service members. Results indicated that although Service members were aware of many formal (e.g., TRICARE, military supported child care) and informal (e.g., religious services, support groups) supports, use of many of the supports was limited.
Key Findings
Participants’ awareness of formal supports varied from 65% awareness of military child care, to 100% awareness of the chapel or chaplain.
Participants’ awareness of informal supports varied from 72% awareness of social activities, to 94% awareness of health care.
Participants’ usage of most informal and formal supports was reported between never and yearly, and with supports such as military informational websites and TRICARE they reported usage monthly.
Implications for Program Leaders
Develop workshops that educate Service members on available formal and informal supports
Offer pre and post-deployment support groups for Service members and their families
Disseminate information to community organizations regarding available formal and informal supports for Service members and their families
Implications for Policy Makers
Continue to provide support for informal and formal supports that work to increase Service members and their families readiness for deployment or relocations
Recommend education of professionals who work with deployed Service members and their families on ways to mitigate the effects of stressors (e.g., deployment, reintegration)
Encourage collaboration among DoD programs and community-based organizations to build awareness about available informal and formal supports for Service members and their families
Methods
Participants were recruited during a monthly drill meeting from a National Guard Readiness Center in eastern Washington.
Participants were asked to respond to the questions about their awareness of, access to, usage of, and satisfaction with eight informal and ten formal supports.
Data analysis examined percentages and mean responses for survey items in order to assess awareness, access, and usage of the different supports.
Participants
There were 42 Service members who participated in the study.
Participants ranged in age from 19 to 50 years old.
The majority of participants were male (98%), White (68%), and were employed outside of the military full time (64%).
Limitations
The sample in this study was small and participants were mostly White men from one region of the U.S.; therefore, generalizability is limited.
Participants that stated they were not aware of supports were still asked to respond to the access, satisfaction, and usage questions; which could bias the findings around the usefulness of the support.
Various demographic data such as length of service and deployment were not collected; which could affect the study outcomes.
Avenues for Future Research
Explore, in more depth, the awareness and usage of informal and formal supports with a more diverse population of Service members and families
Investigate the relationship between length of service and informal and formal support awareness and usage
Examine why supports are or are not useful and how to improve use of supports for Service members and their families
Design Rating
1 Star - There are some significant flaws in the study design or research sample such that conclusions drawn from the data are suspect.
Methods Rating
1 Star - There are biases or significant deficits in the way the variables in the study are defined and measured or the analyses indirectly lead to the conclusions of the study.
Limitations Rating
1 Star - There are several factors that limit the ability to extend the results to a population and therefore the results can only be extended to a very specific subset of the population.
Focus
National Guard
Target Population
Population Focus
Military Branch
Military Component
Abstract
Much of the research on military families has focused on active duty service members. Little is known about informal and formal supports that National Guard service members use. Using an ecological systems perspective, this exploratory pilot study assessed awareness, access, use, satisfaction, and perceptions of effectiveness of informal and formal supports in a small group of National Guard service members. Results indicate that although service members are aware of many formal and informal supports, use of many of the supports is limited. Additionally, satisfaction and
perceptions of effectiveness of many supports is neutral. The implications of these results are discussed.
Attach